Who are we?
What do we offer?
What makes the service we offer so special?
Who are our clients?
How do we edit your document?
What are the costs involved in using your service?
How do I submit work to you?
How do I pay you?
What about privacy?
What guarantee do we offer?
Back to Home
 
 
 

What do we offer?

 

We take your basic texts and work with them to produce a document that is perfect, in terms of its English language content, its flow, its logic and pace, and the formatting of the document.

Are you a researcher hoping to publish? We will work with you to produce a well-written and consistent, well-formatted, document before you submit for publication, in order to reduce the chance of rejection during the review process. Research has shown that poorly written draft papers are less likely to be accepted than well-written, well-formatted, research papers.

Are you a student about to submit a thesis? Don’t submit until it has been professionally edited! We will work with you to ensure your document is perfect before you submit it for assessment. Don’t annoy your examiner with silly mistakes in your English or your grammar – let us perfect your thesis so you present the best work you can, to ensure you get the mark you deserve!

Don’t jeopardise the hard work you have put in to your document by presenting it in a poor state to the reviewer or your examiner! Let us help you present your work in the best form you can!

 

 

 

"Factors that caused most problems were poor use of English and careless preparation of the manuscript." Coates et al. (2000). Language and publication in Cardiovascular Research articles. Cardiovascular Research 53(2): 279-285.


"Strength and clarity of the argument was most strongly associated with acceptance, followed by the technical and scientific quality of the paper and its fit to the journal." Radford, D.R. et al. (1999). The criteria used by editors of scientific dental journals in the assessment of manuscripts submitted for publication. British Dental Journal 187(7): 376-379.


"The main strengths in accepted manuscripts were the importance of the problem, excellence of writing, and soundness of design." Eisenberg et al. (2002). Getting in revisited: an analysis of manuscript characteristics, reviewers ratings and acceptance of manuscripts in Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin


"On equal scientific merit, a badly written article will have less chance of being accepted … even if the editor does not identify language as a motive for rejection." Bordage, G. (2001). Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Academic Medicine 76(9): 889-896.